Sunday, September 11, 2011

Close Reading (9 September 2011)

Me Talk Pretty One Day - by David Sedaris
http://www.macobo.com/essays/epdf/Me%20Talk%20Pretty%20One%20Day%20by%20Sedaris.pdf
     David Sedaris's writing is unique in many ways, but one thing that really sets him apart from the rest is his use of vivid imagery. Within the first paragraph, he draws in his reader with a, quite frankly, weird image of the "Festyland" amusement park sign. This "far-flung amusement park... advertises with billboards picturing a cartoon stegosaurus sitting in a canoe and eating what appears to be a ham sandwich." Already the reader feels like they don't belong in their sorroundings, which is just as Sedaris felt. As he becomes more alienated throughout the essay, his mental strength degrades and he begins to create the most interesting images in his head. For example, he asks himself: "why they don't sell cuts of meat in vending machines." The sudden image in the reader's mind of a vending machine full of meat is what makes reading a David Sedaris essay one of a kind.
    An overarching theme in this essay, and in many of Sedaris's essays that are from his time in France, is the feeling of not belonging. The language used in the second paragraph is key to introducing this theme. He begins by having the students around him talking about all of their "vacations", which, by the way, are very important in French culture. Words like "mutual friends" are used to further create an atmosphere of which Sedaris is not part of. Moreover, all of the other students appear "young, attractive, and well-dressed" with "an ease and confidence" that he does not posess. This continues to contribute to his feeling of alienation and uncertainty. With the introduction of his malicious French teacher, on the other hand, David suddenly comes to the conclusion that "I was not alone." This outside force pops the bubble formed around the 'cool kids' and brings everyone closer together. The students bond over their terrifying experiences with the teacher and use their bad French "in the sort of conversation commonly overheard in refugee camps." This goes to show, a common enemy may still defeat you, but the victims usually end up bonding together over the experience.
    The most detail in this piece goes into describing the French teacher that seems to have traumatized Sedaris. At first the reader can accredit the teacher's image to a novice student's first-day jitters. However, the teacher goes on to repeatedly harass the students. She makes the students feel as if they are not good enough to learn the French language. For example, "The teachers reaction led me to believe that these mistakes were capital crimes in the country of France." The in-depth description of her as she "crouched low for her attack" instills fear in the reader, probably because most of us have encountered a teacher sometime in our student years that reminds us of this horrible woman. But even in the darkest of times, Sedaris still manages to fit in a couple jokes: "'I hate you,' she said to me one afternoon. Her english was flawless. 'I really really hate you.' Call me sensitive, but I couldn't help but take that personally." In the end, however, her cruelty ends up giving a sense of hope that only a true American could muster up: "The teacher continued her diatribe and I settled back, bathing in the subtle beauty of each new curse and insult."

4 comments:

  1. I like that you used this essay-- I actually laughed a little out loud when I read the quote about the vending machine full of meat. I think you used a good amount of detail in this, but the amount of quotes could have been reduced a little bit, because I think it gets to a point where they become a bit distracting. I like it overall!

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hello there,

    Okay, nice choice of reading material; Sedaris has a unique way of writing and relating with the modern crowd with his style. I don’t have a personal taste for his writing but I see why people like him.

    As for your close reading, I have to say i liked this essay better than your Open Prompt one. You’re a bit ‘full’ with quotes, not that there is anything wrong with quotes, it’s just that you have to elaborate on each one or each ‘group’ of quotes. If you don’t feel like writing a seven page essay (who does?!) then just ease up on your quotes and focus on the substance and quality of your analysis. Quality over quantity.

    One last thing, just a suggestion, you can really shorten up what you write by showing instead of show and telling. Like, you wrote: “However, the teacher goes on to repeatedly harass the students. She makes the students feel as if they are not good enough to learn the French language. For example, "The teachers reaction led me to believe that these mistakes were capital crimes in the country of France.’” . Sentence 1 says: Teacher harasses student. Sentence 2 says: Student feels bad. Sentence 3 says: Example/quote.

    Instead, something like “The teacher berates her students and the narrator, making him ‘believe that these mistakes were capital crimes in the country of France.’” Will do just fine.
    Overall though, great essay! I hope you know that I’m not picking apart your work and specifically going at you with a metaphorical criticism dagger; I do it for your best interest because I’d want someone looking out for me too. And remember that just because I point out some stuff doesn’t mean that your essay is awful; it’s far far far far from bad, just lookin’ out for a fellow student.

    Goodnight,
    Tia

    ps:It didn't look this long on MicrosoftWord....haha. D:

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi. This has to be my favorite of your pieces that I am reviewing. You really dug deep into each of the aspects you chose to "closely read" and those aspects are very clear, theme, detail and imagery. Well that sentence is going to be awkward if that's not what you wrote about.. but believing it is... You did a very nice job proving each of the points you made. I found myself agreeing with you rather than questioning your claims, now if that doesn't make something effective, I just don't know what does.
    I really don't think I have anything I can critique you on, in general it is a well thought out piece. :)

    ReplyDelete